BUT i found some good ones and better coming in summer time.įor example Compaq 311C with Intel Atom N270 1.6 GHz / 2 GB DDR3 SDRAM / 11.Each reference is on a separate tabbed page for easy cross-referencing. Yup, there is alote of trash netbooks with slow pref. Jeroen wrote:The license will not be the problem. I’m not only negative about this netbook it has a very good screen depleting the battery takes ages (great!!). So if you are realy going to do some imaging on the netbook make sure you have plenty of spare time. I think stitching the photo’s to one image (eq with PTGui ) will be a torture. I can add descriptions to the pictures but I only do this because I know it saves me a lot work at home not because its fun to work with. I use a Samsung N110 netbook (I upgraded the 1GB to 2GB memory) and use this netbook as a imagetank to backup my CF card from my Canon 5D2 When using Lightroom to add images I always make sure I do not have to wait for it (it is slooooow). When u need CPU/Memory/Disk power do some serious working a netbook will be a big, or better a huge, enormous, disappointment. Just keep in mind they do have a way to detect if more than two computers run the same serial key.Įldariel wrote:i planing to buy netbook cause my normal laptop is more than 4kg and it heavy to carry around, so if i install my user licence on netbook and will work from it will i get problems with pano2vr?īut my (limited) experience with a netbook is you will be happy if you carry it but not when use it. I had to get in touch with the author and explain to get it solved. While doing and update, the key was flagged and the software stopped working. I got new PC and put all my software on it, the previous PC was to be formatted and given away but I still use it before I transfer all my data. I can't remember whether it was pano2vr or PTgui, but while back one of the programs did stop working, because I put it on a 3rd computer. You could give it to a friend and all he needs to do is use your registered name and serial key, it's just a matter of honoring the license agreement, but what is your take on it, it's up to you. Regarding the name, it's not actual computer's user name, just a "user" to remain the same, meaning the person who paid for that software. Well, normally the license apply to single user/computer, for most of the software out there, so I think Thomas's approach is quite fair, it's just cool return theĬourtesy and respect that policy.
0 kommentar(er)
